For now we are young

Let us lay in the sun and count every beautiful thing we can see.
~ Monday, May 28 ~
Permalink

(Source: bullshitwonder)


21 notes
reblogged via leftwing-secularist
~ Saturday, May 26 ~
Permalink

tinyphalanges:

ALL OF MY LOVE ALLLLLL OF IT

(Source: thefinestmuffinsandbagels)


289 notes
reblogged via tinyphalanges
~ Friday, May 25 ~
Permalink

30,541 notes
reblogged via hanakmat
Permalink

You want to say Hi to the cute girl on the subway. How will she react? Fortunately, I can tell you with some certainty, because she’s already sending messages to you. Looking out the window, reading a book, working on a computer, arms folded across chest, body away from you = do not disturb. So, y’know, don’t disturb her. Really. Even to say that you like her hair, shoes, or book. A compliment is not always a reason for women to smile and say thank you. You are a threat, remember? You are Schrödinger’s Rapist. Don’t assume that whatever you have to say will win her over with charm or flattery. Believe what she’s signaling, and back off.

If you speak, and she responds in a monosyllabic way without looking at you, she’s saying, “I don’t want to be rude, but please leave me alone.” You don’t know why. It could be “Please leave me alone because I am trying to memorize Beowulf.” It could be “Please leave me alone because you are a scary, scary man with breath like a water buffalo.” It could be “Please leave me alone because I am planning my assassination of a major geopolitical figure and I will have to kill you if you are able to recognize me and blow my cover.”

On the other hand, if she is turned towards you, making eye contact, and she responds in a friendly and talkative manner when you speak to her, you are getting a green light. You can continue the conversation until you start getting signals to back off.

The fourth point: If you fail to respect what women say, you label yourself a problem.

There’s a man with whom I went out on a single date—afternoon coffee, for one hour by the clock—on July 25th. In the two days after the date, he sent me about fifteen e-mails, scolding me for non-responsiveness. I e-mailed him back, saying, “Look, this is a disproportionate response to a single date. You are making me uncomfortable. Do not contact me again.” It is now October 7th. Does he still e-mail?

Yeah. He does. About every two weeks.

This man scores higher on the threat level scale than Man with the Cockroach Tattoos. (Who, after all, is guilty of nothing more than terrifying bad taste.) You see, Mr. E-mail has made it clear that he ignores what I say when he wants something from me. Now, I don’t know if he is an actual rapist, and I sincerely hope he’s not. But he is certainly Schrödinger’s Rapist, and this particular Schrödinger’s Rapist has a probability ratio greater than one in sixty. Because a man who ignores a woman’s NO in a non-sexual setting is more likely to ignore NO in a sexual setting, as well.

So if you speak to a woman who is otherwise occupied, you’re sending a subtle message. It is that your desire to interact trumps her right to be left alone. If you pursue a conversation when she’s tried to cut it off, you send a message. It is that your desire to speak trumps her right to be left alone. And each of those messages indicates that you believe your desires are a legitimate reason to override her rights.

For women, who are watching you very closely to determine how much of a threat you are, this is an important piece of data.


11,252 notes
reblogged via maddex
Permalink

samwisepotter:

Despite the poor video quality, I fucking miss VHS.

For the past four days I’ve been transferring all of our old vhs tapes of birthdays, school Christmas shows, and talent shows to dvd.

Discoveries made:

  • When I was eight, I sounded just like my brother does now
  • My parents looked happy together at some point
  • Christmas celebrations in Egypt are bizarre

(Source: forever90s)


218,834 notes
reblogged via oh-you-beauty
Permalink
leftwing-secularist:

tpmmedia:

An Obama Spending Spree? Hardly
TPM’s Sahil Kapur looks at the numbers behind a recurrent theme of recent budget debates:
A dominant theme of the national political discourse has been the crushing spending spree the U.S. has ostensibly embarked on during the Obama presidency. That argument, ignited by Republicans and picked up by many elite opinion makers, has infused the national dialogue and shaped the public debate in nearly every major budget battle of the last thee years.
But the numbers tell a different story.
The fact that the national debt has risen from $10.6 trillion to $15.6 trillion under Obama’s watch makes for easy partisan attacks. But the vast bulk of the increase was caused by a combination of revenue losses due to the 2008-09 economic downturn as well as Bush-era tax cuts and automatic increases in safety-net spending that were already written into law.
Obama’s policies, including the much-criticized stimulus package, have caused the slowest increase in federal spending of any president in almost 60 nears, according to data compiled by the financial news service MarketWatch.
(Read the full story)

“We always gotta get in there and clean up the mess afterwards”

leftwing-secularist:

tpmmedia:

An Obama Spending Spree? Hardly

TPM’s Sahil Kapur looks at the numbers behind a recurrent theme of recent budget debates:

A dominant theme of the national political discourse has been the crushing spending spree the U.S. has ostensibly embarked on during the Obama presidency. That argument, ignited by Republicans and picked up by many elite opinion makers, has infused the national dialogue and shaped the public debate in nearly every major budget battle of the last thee years.

But the numbers tell a different story.

The fact that the national debt has risen from $10.6 trillion to $15.6 trillion under Obama’s watch makes for easy partisan attacks. But the vast bulk of the increase was caused by a combination of revenue losses due to the 2008-09 economic downturn as well as Bush-era tax cuts and automatic increases in safety-net spending that were already written into law.

Obama’s policies, including the much-criticized stimulus package, have caused the slowest increase in federal spending of any president in almost 60 nears, according to data compiled by the financial news service MarketWatch.

(Read the full story)

“We always gotta get in there and clean up the mess afterwards”


507 notes
reblogged via leftwing-secularist
Permalink
And so for me, the whole point of the gender movement is that it’s not only about those familiar specimens inevitabley correlated in the bianary zoo: the stone butches, drag kings and queens, lipsticks and deisel dykes, radical faeries and nelly fags, the transexuals, transgendered, crossdressers, and intersexed. It’s also about the 17 year old who ruins her health with anorexia because real women are suposed to be unnaturally thin, It’s about the aging lesbian who suffers a full hysterectomy because certain kinds of gendered bodies don’t matter. And it’s about the shy artistic little straight boy who is taunted and assualted each day because he is percieved as genderqueer, gender different, or simply gender vulnerable.
— Riki Wilchins Gender Rights Are Human Rights  (via transformfeminism)

(Source: skrinkles3)


112 notes
reblogged via maddex
~ Thursday, May 24 ~
Permalink
[Flash 10 is required to watch video]

My brother is a cutie. 


Permalink

Hello world!

I’m back in the tumblrverse, and it’s summer now, so expect a lot more from me. Starting with these awesome pictures (video to follow) of my brother’s awesome domino chain!


1 note
~ Tuesday, April 10 ~
Permalink

Announcement

I’m going to be off tumblr for the next week because I really need to get my shit together and focus on school/life. In the meantime, if you see me on here, please yell at me until I leave.


Permalink

heartworm

dictionaryofobscuresorrows:

n. a relationship or friendship that you can’t get out of your head, which you thought had faded long ago but is still somehow alive and unfinished, like an abandoned campsite whose smoldering embers still have the power to start a forest fire.


8,692 notes
reblogged via dictionaryofobscuresorrows
~ Friday, April 6 ~
Permalink

through3dcoloredglasses:

Daniel Radcliffe filming Kill Your Darlings on Columbia University campus.

I just don’t see him as Allen Ginsberg.


64 notes
reblogged via realityisrunningaway
~ Thursday, April 5 ~
Permalink

lgbtlaughs:

The Westboro Baptist Church and Don’t Ask Don’t Tell are discussed and defamed on the British television show Good News Week. Also, the word “cocktopus” is mentioned.

[via simplyanothervoice]


915 notes
reblogged via lgbtlaughs
~ Wednesday, April 4 ~
Permalink

49,278 notes
reblogged via jedijessi
Permalink

chotpot:

People are butts about gender sometimes! So here is a comic talking about how it really isn’t a big deal!

When I was with James this week I wrote a little poem about gender
and decided to draw a comic for said poem.

Hope you guys enjoy!


125,390 notes
reblogged via maddex